Excerpt from the book Is This A God Of Love,
by A. E. Wilder-Smith
Chapter V
The Problem of Rebuilding
Just what
would we expect a God of
love to
do after his creatures had chosen
the wrong
road — turning their backs on
the only
good?
The
Scriptures say that even before
the wrong
choice had been taken either by
man or angels,
God, because he is omniscient,
knew all
about it. He had even
drawn up
careful plans in advance to cope
with the
situation that would arise, even
though he
was in no way responsible for
it, nor
did he cause it (cf Rev. 13:8, Eph.
1:4, Heb.
4:3, 1 Pet. 1:19-20).
This last
fact—that God, if he is God,
must
obviously have been omniscient
with
respect to the fall long before it
happened
— has been a stumbling block
to many.
Actually, few real intellectual
difficulties
are involved in this matter if it
is
considered carefully.
If I
observe a person carefully over a
period of
time, I may notice some of his
little
idiosyncrasies. He may say “Ah,” for
example,
as a prelude to every difficult
word he
has to pronounce. Or he may
twitch
his eyebrows (or his ears) before
relating
a good joke. Gradually I learn to
predict
just what he is going to do before
he
actually does it. My previous observations
allow me
to do this with a fair
amount of
accuracy.
However,
my ability to foretell his
actions
in no way makes me responsible
for them
when he acts. Similarly, the fact
that God
was able to foresee what Adam
and Eve,
the angels and mankind in
general,
would do, does not necessarily
implicate
him in the sense that it makes
him
responsible for initiating their actions
and choices. The only implication
is that
involved in his having given them a
gloriously
free choice of action in order to
create the possibility of their
love.
The Problem Of The
Consequences
At this point many will maintain
that,
if God saw in advance the chaos,
misery
and suffering which would certainly
follow
the gift of the possibility of
love, why
did he proceed with his plans to
create.
Was he not rather sadistic to have
persisted
in these plans, knowing the
consequences
in advance?
In principle, the same type of
questioning
arises every day in our own lives,
but seemingly we don't recognize
this fact.
Consider, for example, the decision
we
must make on whether to marry. Even
the
marriage ceremony emphasizes rather
drastically that the same question
is involved,
for the clergyman says our marriage
vows are binding until death us do
part. Surely there is scarcely
greater grief
than that experienced by a really
devoted
couple when separated by death. We
could,
of
course, avoid this terrible grief by the
simple expedient of not creating a marriage
relationship
at all! Avoid marriage
and its
love relationship and no grief of
parting
by death will ever overtake you.
Yet, we
rightly go into marriage with
our eyes
open. We know that in normal
circumstances,
death and all its sorrows
will
overtake us and will separate us. Most
of us
fear this more than we could ever
say. In
spite of all this we marry, because
we
believe that the joy of love and the
ennoblement
of giving ourselves to another
in the
abandon of devotion even for
a day
(and forty or fifty years pass like a
day) is
better than no love at all. It is
written
of Jesus Christ that he endured
the
sorrows of death on the cross for the
sake of
the joys which would result from
the
sorrow. The same principle is
involved
here. The
joy of love, even "short" love,
because
it stems from a God of love,
compensates
for even the sorrows of a
cruel
death such as that which Jesus
suffered
for all mankind, and the death
which
separates all lovers.
The enrichment
and ennoblement of
the human
character brought about by
the
experience of even the brief joy of love,
as God
intended it to be, compensate for
certain
future death, separation and
present
trials. It is a question of balance.
Those who
know the love of God in Christ
and those
who have experienced a faint
taste of
that same quality of love in God given
marriage
will confess that it is worth
the
certain severe suffering which it brings
with it.
The principle is that even a little,
short-lived
love is better than none at all.
The reason
is that even mortal love changes
the
eternal human psyche.
Evidently
the Creator, being love personified,
thinks
this way too, for he did
indeed
create us and the rest of the fallen
creation,
in spite of the foreseen mess and
separation.
All the
same, many people — including
ourselves
sometimes — feel tempted
to say
"God, forgive God" when
contemplating
the dire
mess in which the world
finds
itself. Yet if it is true as the Scriptures
assure us that temporal sufferings
can and do bring eternal
recompense, if it
is true that suffering is not
necessarily
punitive but can be remedial as
well, then,
relying on the Scriptures, we are
able to
accept the anguish, just as God did
when
he crucified God to remedy the fall
of man.
The next question is: what would we
expect God to do to pull us out of
the mire?
The Problem Of
God's Answer
Now that the fall has taken place
and
sin and anguish are in the world,
what
would we expect God's answer to be?
The
answer we give will depend entirely
on our
conception of God's character.
If God is a God of love, then he is
our
loved one. What would we expect a
true
loved one to do who had been
misunderstood
and rejected? Perhaps the
scriptural
answer is the best one here: Love
"suffereth long, and is
kind...is not easily
provoked, thinketh no evil...
beareth all
things... endureth all things...
(love) never
faileth."
Surely that is the reaction we
would
expect of someone who truly loves
us.
Love
endures all these things in the hope
of
ultimate success in the wooing process
of love.
God saw man's wrong choice and
all of
its consequences which would lead
to chaos
and anguish, long before the
wrong
choice was made. When it did
come,
however, we would not expect a real
God of
love to impatiently and disgustedly
dismiss
and destroy the object of his love.
Many who
have difficulties with these
points
apparently expect God to act like a
hard-hearted
unforgiving tyrant rather
than a
forgiving father. Such an expectation
probably
arises from the fact that
such
action is typical of short-fused people
like
ourselves. But then, we are no real
examples
of love in being short-fused.
In actual
fact we would expect a God
of love
to try to salvage what he could out
of the
carnage. It takes the patience of
genuine
love to set about this process. He
had
warned in faithfulness and sternness
of the
consequences of the wrong choice
—men
would surely die of it—but neither
angel nor
man heeded. One thing God
would not
be expected to do, once the
wrong choice had been taken, would
be to
block the way back to himself by
attempting
to threaten, cajole or force us
back.
Force cannot restore anything in
the way
of love. That would be to cut off
all possibility
of a way back.
How To Restore
Love
Thus, in order to restore love,
there
remains only one way open—the
exercise
of further patient love.
Accordingly, God
exercises long-suffering and
patience in
trying to win us back freely to
love and
reason.
Therefore, we should expect the
consequences
of the fall not to be "fire
and
thunder," but rather the
"still small voice"
in the attempt to realize the word
said
about God by the apostle: “who
desires all
men...to come to the knowledge of
the
truth."
But this attitude of quietness and
perseverance can be mistaken for
passivity
or even inactivity. A large part of
the
Scriptures is devoted to just this
point in
fact. God is not inactive; he is
not indifferent.
He
is certainly not dead: “The Lord is
not slack
concerning his promise, as some
men count
slackness; but he is
longsuffering
toward us, not willing that
any
should perish, but that all should
come to repentance.” This means just what
it says:
not all men will repent and come
to a
knowledge of the truth. But it confirms
that God
is a God of love and
patience
who is ready and willing to receive
all who
do turn to him.
The fact,
then, that He has waited so
long
before judging sinful man is, in reality,
another
indication of God's true
character
— loving-kindness, patience,
long-suffering,
not being easily provoked.
Only by
looking at the situation in this
way can I
see any explanation of why God
has not
long since exercised general
judgement
on all of us and set up a
"puppet
state" on earth and in heaven to
slavishly
and immediately carry out his
every
demand, just as any dictator would
do if he
could, particularly if his will had
been
thwarted as God's will certainly has
been.
Thwarting God's Will
Some will feel shocked. Can, then,
God's will be thwarted? The
fatalistic
Muslims think not. Is it possible
that his
will may not be done on earth as it
is in
heaven? Anyone unsure about this
point
should ask himself whether God
planned
any act of sadism that has taken
place.
Was it his will to kill six or
seven million
Jews in gas chambers simply because
they were Jews? Was this not
rather,
thwarting God's perfect will? And
does not
any other sin also thwart it?
Sinning is one way of thwarting his
will. Another way would be to set
up a
dictatorship to "restore order
to the chaotic
creation." If this route to
rebuilding
creation were adopted, it would
just as
effectively thwart God's real
purpose of
setting up a kingdom of love. Under
the
present circumstances of freedom to
do
good or bad, there are still a few
people
who see the situation as it really
is and
who turn to God to be refreshed by
his
love, even in the midst of the
general
anguish of creation. Even a little
of such
love and refreshment is better than
none
at all. If the Lord had judged
immediately
after the fall or after any sin, how
many
who have since drunk of the water
of the
well of life and love would have
been lost
to him and his kingdom of love for
ever?
His patience has been rewarded with
responding love which would have
been
impossible if immediate judgment
had
supervened.
King George VI Of
England
A story is told about King George
VI of
Great Britain and how he won
Elizabeth.
As a young man the future king fell
in love
with the charming young Scottish
lady.
After a long time of reflection he
plucked
up his courage and approached her
on the
subject although he was rather shy,
especially
with the opposite sex. He had
never been much of a lady's man and
was
neither very robust nor strongly
masculine
in the film-star sense of the word.
Moreover, he had a slight speech
defect,
which added to his difficulties.
His proposal
was rejected.
The young
prince, greatly upset over
this
rebuff, asked his mother, Queen Mary,
for her
advice. The Queen listened sympathetically
to her
son's tale of woe. Then she
told him
she just wanted to ask one
question
before advising him. Did he really
love
Elizabeth only? Would he be able
to find a
substitute if Elizabeth proved
reluctant?
After a moment's consideration,
he
replied that he would marry
Elizabeth
or no one else. "Well then," said
his
mother, “there is only one way open to
you. Go
and ask her again."
So the
young prince put his pride in
his
pocket, gathered up his remaining
courage,
and arranged another interview
with
Elizabeth. He probably stuttered as
he
repeated his proposal, remembering
what had
happened to him the first time
at her
hands. She refused him again.
Not
knowing what to do then, he
returned
to his mother, Queen Mary, for
advice.
Again she listened quietly—some
say,
severely — to the whole story. She
showed
him every sympathy, and, after
hearing
all he had to say, indicated that
she had
one question to ask before she
could
advise him. The question was: "Do
you
really want her after this rebuff?
There are
plenty of other young ladies
around
who would be delighted to have a
prince as
a husband. I myself could show
you some.”
But poor George was quite
clear
about his feelings. It was Elizabeth
or no one
at all. “Then," said his mother,
"in
that case there is only one way open to
you. Go
and ask her again."
So, after
a considerable period of
mental
preparation, the young prince
approached
the pretty young Scottish
lady the
third time. In the meantime, she
had
noticed how serious the prince was.
His love
and determination to win her had
indeed
been constant. She saw that the
great
effort he made in coming the third
time,
putting his pride in his pocket demonstrated
his
singleness of purpose. And
she began
to recognize something new in
herself.
His undoubted love toward her
was
beginning to kindle an answering fire
in her own
heart. His warmth of love, even
though he
was awkward and not very
good at
courting a young lady's affection,
was
beginning to warm her affection towards
him. In
short, his love was beginning
to kindle
her love, and she began to
transmit
some of the love she received
from him.
She began to feel she was able
to say
that she loved and admired him in
his
singleness of purpose and constancy.
Thus, the
story goes, began one of the
really
happy families in the annals of royal
households.
This love lasted until the
king's
death.
Love
begets love. But it often has to be
very
patient, longsuffering and kind until
the fire
is kindled in the prospective
partner's
heart. The Scriptures say that
God woos
in one way or another every
man and
woman ever born. Through the
circumstances
of life, or through the
Scriptures,
he quietly goes on as the years
pass,
until we begin to return to him some
of the
warmth of love which he has for us.
For we
are told that God has his delight
among the
sons of men. He loves us,
indifferent
or rejectors though we have
been of
his overtures towards us. He is
working toward the day when we may
begin to return to him the same
love, and
to delight in his friendship as he
will
delight in ours.
Once kindled, this love must be
regularly
tended in order to maintain the
warmth of the blaze which God
intends
our love to be — warming and
refreshing
to both partners, so that both can
rejoice
in the happiness which love brings.
God is
love and we were so constructed in
his
image that we can only flourish
when
bathed in such love—breathing it in
and
giving it out.
But it would be one-sided to leave
the
story here. All love stories do not
end this
way. We must look at one other less
pleasant possibility.
The Final Refusal
There comes a time in every love
affair
where a final answer toward the
wooer
must be made. This final answer may
be
either yes or no. One day the wooed
one
may make a rejection which,
although she
perhaps did not know it, was the
final one.
It turns
out to be permanent. In the one
case, she
may, of course, die. That finishes
the
wooing of a mortal man—when
immortality
lays hold of the prospective
bride.
Another
possibility is that the wooer
may cease
to woo. The “wooed” is not the
only one
who has a free will to accept or
reject
the wooer. God as the wooer has a
free will
too — to stop or to continue
wooing
according to his infinite wisdom.
He can
decide how long to woo and be
rejected
and also when to stop wooing
altogether.
Even this final decision to stop
wooing,
will, we are told, be made on a
basis of
love. It will, accordingly, be put off
as long
as possible.
There is
a third and last possibility. If
the wooed
marries another, then further
courtship
by the first suitor would be
thoroughly
out of order and outside the
confines
of love. The Scriptures say quite
clearly
that this state of affairs may be
reached
in the spiritual sense. There comes
a time
when a man “marries this world,”
and after
that God no longer offers his
salvation,
his "marriage relationship" to
him. His
Spirit strives with him no longer.
A man's
spirit and God's Spirit become
forever
estranged, for man's spirit finally
"marries
another," selling itself to this
world and
its rebellion against the Most
High.
We humans
can seldom clearly see
when such
a final act takes place. We
cannot
determine when God's Spirit gives
a man up
forever. But that such does
occur is
perfectly clear, even though it is
invisible
to man's mortal eye. We can give
ourselves
entirely over to material things
such as a
career, money or social standing.
It may be
the love of things more
definitely
sinful that cuts us off. In extreme
cases, we
can "sell ourselves to the
devil''
quite consciously—as many Nazis
did when
they knowingly cooperated with
Hitler in
liquidating human beings in the
interests
of their own promotion within
the
party. Many do the same just as
effectively
when they value promotion in
their
jobs before promotion in the kingdom
of
heaven. They do not seek "the
kingdom
of heaven first.” Some men resolve
never to
discuss spiritual matters
again
because "they disturb." For them,
the
courtship is over; they're married to
another.
The New
Testament letter to the Hebrews
speaks of
that cessation. "Today,
when you
hear this voice, do not harden
your
hearts as in the rebellion, on the day
of
testing in the wilderness, where your
fathers
put me to the test and saw my
works for
forty years. Therefore, I was
provoked
with that generation and said,
‘They
always go astray in their hearts;
they have
not known my ways.’ As I swore
in my
wrath, ‘They shall never enter my
rest.’”
The
context of this statement shows
that the
Lord spoke and spoke again, and
wooed and
wooed again, but the Hebrews
of that
generation closed their hearts and
inward
ears. In the end, God gave them up,
and that
generation, except for Joshua
and
Caleb, never entered the promised
land but
perished in the wilderness. This
serves as
a parable for us, to whom God
also
speaks. We can be so occupied with
the joys
and trials of this life that we, too,
do not hear.
We, too, can miss the joy and
rest of
his love by acting as did the Hebrews.
"For
it is impossible to restore again to
repentance
those who have once been
enlightened,
who have tasted the heavenly
gift, and
have become partakers of
the Holy
Spirit and have tasted the goodness
of the
Word of God and the powers of
the age
to come, if they then commit
apostasy,
since they crucify the Son of
God on
their own account and hold him
up to
contempt (Hebrews 6:4-6, RSV).”
This
warning is to those who have at
one time
responded to God’s wooing, and
have
therefore tasted his goodness, and
then
cease to respond. A time comes when
it is
impossible to renew them, for the
striving
of God’s Spirit with them ceases.
Another
Scripture passage speaks in
exactly
the same tenor: "For if we sin
deliberately
after receiving the knowledge
of the
truth, there no longer remains a
sacrifice
for sins, but a fearful prospect of
judgment,
and a fiery fire which will consume
the
adversaries... How much worse
punishment
do you think will be deserved
by the
man who has spurned the Son of
God and
profaned the blood of the covenant
by which
he was sanctified, and outraged
the
Spirit of grace?.. .It is a fearful thing to
fall into
the hands of the living God
(starting
at Hebrews 10:26)."
I take
this warning for myself, believing
that I
can learn from all Scripture. The
point is,
God can and does speak to men;
he does
woo. If they respond, he allows
them to
taste in this life the things of his
kingdom
of love. But his wooing is dynamic,
and it is
dependent on our daily
response.
Continual spurning may end in
our
"marrying another forever." Then his
wooing
stops. Rejecting God’s grace in
Christ
simply means declaring ourselves
as
candidates for no grace, which is the
same
thing as being ripe for judgment.
This
raises the whole question of
judgment
at the hands of a so-called
loving
and gracious God. Can we accept
this? Is
all suffering a judgment? Or must
suffering
and judgment be kept apart in our minds?
Here is a link to a page where you will find a PDF of the entire book for free:
http://ph16.blogspot.com/p/free-books-good-ones-you-can-read-right.html
PART 1: http://ph16.blogspot.com/2017/02/guest-post-love-of-god-and-suffering-pt1.html
PART 3: http://ph16.blogspot.com/2017/04/guest-post-love-of-god-and-suffering-pt3.html
http://ph16.blogspot.com/p/free-books-good-ones-you-can-read-right.html
PART 1: http://ph16.blogspot.com/2017/02/guest-post-love-of-god-and-suffering-pt1.html
PART 3: http://ph16.blogspot.com/2017/04/guest-post-love-of-god-and-suffering-pt3.html
No comments:
Post a Comment